Celtic PLC Board reject share for value proposal

The Celtic PLC Board, in the form of the Company Secretary, has responded to the formal proposal put by the Celtic Trust to them to offer shares to 2020-21 season ticket holders by way of meeting their obligation to provide added value as per their statement dated 23/6/2020 [23 June Celtic statement].  The letter acknowledged receipt of a copy of the advice provided to the SFA regarding the contractual issues around season tickets during the pandemic from the Society of Chief Officers of Trading Standards in Scotland [Click here to see full text of the Trading Standards advice].

The letter contained a rejection of the proposal and the reason given was that the Trust had proposed a value for the issue which would not be possible under the existing authority (derived from a 2020 PLC AGM resolution) to issue shares on a non-preemptive rights basis.  Moreover, they indicated that they had taken advice and that the cost of the management of this process would be in excess of £1,000,000.  The entire premise of the rejection however, is false, given that there was no value indicated by the Trust in the formal proposal.  Had they discussed the matter with us in February or March (something they explicitly refused to do) this could have been discussed and a more modest but meaningful value could have been agreed.

The Trust has written to the PLC expressing our disappointment at their refusal to consider the proposal in a genuine and meaningful way and the extremely discourteous way they have treated the Celtic Trust (and, by extension, all of its’ members and the members of other organisations which supported this proposal) by refusing to meet with us to discuss this proposal at any time between February and late May before rejecting it outright.

In the letter, the Company Secretary, expressed the position of the PLC Board that they had already provided added value and were continuing to discuss ways to provide additional value.  The added value they say they have provided consists of a stream for a league cup game, two friendlies, two delayed European games (after they’d finished) and online programmes.  The Celtic Trust does not agree that any value has been provided which would meet the terms of the commitments made in June 2020 and we are also clear that no meaningful consultation has taken place given that no alternative proposals have been put to anyone by the PLC Board.

We are extremely disappointed that the PLC Board has behaved in such a disrespectful and uncooperative way and we await their decision on how they will meet their obligations under the June 2020 statement.   We believe the Board have adopted an incredibly risky strategy which could have serious repercussions for the financial health of the club.  However, it remains to be seen whether this gamble will pay off in terms of season ticket renewals or not.

5 thoughts on “Celtic PLC Board reject share for value proposal

  • 25th May 2021 at 8:53 pm
    Permalink

    Time for some sort of action as the board seem to think that they have provided added value and that there were highlights this season and none of the bad stuff was their fault. Is it just me or are they on a different planet

    Reply
  • 25th May 2021 at 9:07 pm
    Permalink

    Club has no respect for their customers, they have demonstrated that throughout the past year. Fans should vote with their wallets, that’s the only way the PLC listens.

    Reply
  • 25th May 2021 at 10:59 pm
    Permalink

    Club widnae give you steam aff their shite ….that’s how tight they are ( Kelly’s and Whites ) all over again …mark my words

    Reply
  • 26th May 2021 at 5:20 am
    Permalink

    I’m a season ticket holder and have been for 20 yrs and the added value they talk about is trying to take the Micheal as per usual from our board

    Reply
  • 26th May 2021 at 6:43 am
    Permalink

    Nothing will change without the 51% rule and subsequently removing the club from it’s public listing. Celtic is a business. The primary purpose of a business is to make money. Being a public listed company almost makes that a legal requirement. The 10 in a row was lost due to this. Buying young “raw” players to sell and papering the cracks with short-term loan signings is not about building a team to be successful. It’s about building a team in the most efficient way financially. Peter Lawell has left, Neil Lennon has left, and this will make absolutely no difference to the long-term vision of this club. The board has essentially stayed the same. Fans come last. The only way to change this is through a properly organized fan revolution. This is as good a time as any to do it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Robert Johnston Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.